Which buying topics can be reviewed?
Depending on the mandate: buying conditions, budget control, conformity with the media plan, evidence of booked delivery, technology and third-party costs, and transparency of the partners and systems involved.
The H.O.T. AG Buying & Transparency Audit reviews buying, budget use, conditions, documentation and, for digital buying, the technical supply chain. The goal is to understand which partners are involved, which costs and roles arise and whether the selected paths provide verifiable value.
Depending on the mandate: buying conditions, budget control, conformity with the media plan, evidence of booked delivery, technology and third-party costs, and transparency of the partners and systems involved.
In programmatic buying, we examine the DSPs, exchanges, SSPs, resellers and deals through which inventory is bought and whether those routes are technically, commercially and qualitatively transparent.
No. Supply Path Optimization is not a counting exercise. An additional partner can provide legitimate technical or commercial value. Transparency, necessity, cost and quality contribution matter.
They are important transparency signals but not quality guarantees. Declarations and standards do not replace verification that inventory origin, seller chain and actual delivery are consistent.
A prioritized view of cost, process and supply-path questions: which routes appear plausible and valuable, where clarification is needed and which structures should be reduced, contractually specified or investigated further.
We define mandate, scope and responsibilities before the project begins – and clarify whether H.O.T. AG is needed as media consultant or independent audit function.